Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

 

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: New York State end to caching as we knew it< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
Rocky Offline
Navicache Dude




Group: Members
Posts: 61
Joined: June 2001
    Posted: April 23 2004,4:32 pm QUOTE

People who have no sense have been harassing officials at the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) about establishing a policy for placing geocaches.  This has been driven on a forum on the other site.  The result will be a disaster.  Red tape will now become the name of the game.  Already talking about a $25 permit and liability insurance.  As I said over there too bad people could not leave a sleeping dog alone.
Back to top
Profile PM 
apogee Offline
Navicacher




Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: April 2004
    Posted: April 24 2004,11:37 am QUOTE

There was a time in this country when open land was truly in the public domain and free for people to use and enjoy as they saw fit.  With the end of the frontier and increasing population pressure, it became apparent that it was necessary to impose rules and regulations to preserve scarce resources for future generations.  That's well and good.  We shouldn't allow places of natural beauty to be spoiled by careless or commercial use.  On the other hand, it opens the way for over-regulation and the removal of lands from reasonable public use.  Geocaching in itself, is a benign activity.  It shouldn't be subject to the regulatory whims of lawyers and bureaucrats, IMHO.

Administrators on the other site say they will now be checking to see if owners have obtained 'necessary' permits for geocache placement inside state parks.  $25 per cache.  How many people can afford such a fee, and how much 'service' does it provide?  Those are the questions people should be asking, but they find it easier to believe what they are told.
Unfortunately, many people seem to think that government agencies are their friends, that they are looking out for their interests and that of the environment.  Wrong.  Bureaucracies are about politics and empire-building.  The more they can regulate things, the more important and secure their position becomes.  I think it's wise to assume an adversarial relationship, and as you say, let sleeping dogs lie.


--------------
no signal loss here
Back to top
Profile PM 
PC Medic Offline
Cache Master




Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 1452
Joined: Dec. 2001
    Posted: April 24 2004,12:12 pm QUOTE

First keep in mind that he said there is 'talk of a fee', nothing that I have heard is official. Remember voices are heard (especially in an election year) so if you do not feel this fee would be fair (which it certainly would not be), then now is the time to write your state representative. I am not sure how they would justify such a fee if the same is not charged to any other group/individual using the same area. Remember, they can only 'strictly' regulate your freedom if you sit back and let them.

Another thing to remember is that there is plenty of land in N.Y. that the NYDEC has absolutely no jurisdiction over.


--------------
'PC Medic'
Back to top
Profile PM AOL YIM 
apogee Offline
Navicacher




Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: April 2004
    Posted: April 24 2004,2:59 pm QUOTE

Apparently, the fee system is already in place in Pennsylvania.  Here's what GC's site approver had to say about it.
Quote
When a new cache is submitted and the map shows it as being located in a state park or state forest, I do look for the cache page to mention that a permit has been obtained. We even have a graphic that gets placed on all DCNR-approved caches to help spread the word about the policy.

I'm in California, so I don't think writing my state representative will help - in fact I don't even want to plant an idea like geocaching permits in their greedy little heads.


--------------
no signal loss here
Back to top
Profile PM 
PC Medic Offline
Cache Master




Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 1452
Joined: Dec. 2001
    Posted: April 24 2004,7:04 pm QUOTE

Quote (apogee @ April 24 2004,4:59 pm)
Apparently, the fee system is already in place in Pennsylvania.  Here's what GC's site approver had to say about it.
Quote
When a new cache is submitted and the map shows it as being located in a state park or state forest, I do look for the cache page to mention that a permit has been obtained. We even have a graphic that gets placed on all DCNR-approved caches to help spread the word about the policy.

I'm in California, so I don't think writing my state representative will help - in fact I don't even want to plant an idea like geocaching permits in their greedy little heads.

Not true. While Pennsylvania (and some other states) do require you obtain permission and in some cases a permit is issued, this permit is not fee based. In fact the form and more information regarding caches on PA DNR managed lands is  available  HERE.


Edited by PC Medic on April 24 2004,7:09 pm

--------------
'PC Medic'
Back to top
Profile PM AOL YIM 
4 replies since April 23 2004,4:32 pm < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

 
reply to topic new topic new poll

Quick Reply: New York State end to caching as we knew it
iB Code Buttons
You are Posting as:
Guest
Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code