Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

 

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Delisting caches, archival/delisting< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
southdeltan Offline
Navicacher




Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: Aug. 2003
    Posted: Jan. 26 2004,4:13 pm QUOTE

How do I delist (archive) my caches?  I don't see a feature that allows me to do this.

southdeltan
Back to top
Profile PM 
PC Medic Offline
Cache Master




Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 1452
Joined: Dec. 2001
    Posted: Jan. 26 2004,4:33 pm QUOTE

You may Edit/Retire a cache from the cache page by clicking on "Edit Cache' in the top menu. The option to retire the cache is near the top of the form.

Just out of curiosity, have the caches been retired or was there a problem with the listings here?


--------------
'PC Medic'
Back to top
Profile PM AOL YIM 
welch Offline
Caching Maniac




Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: April 2002
    Posted: Jan. 27 2004,7:46 am QUOTE

Quote (PC Medic @ Jan. 26 2004,5:33 pm)
Just out of curiosity, have the caches been retired or was there a problem with the listings here?

What sort of problems can there be with the listing here? :withstupid

--------------
Back to top
Profile PM 
PC Medic Offline
Cache Master




Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 1452
Joined: Dec. 2001
    Posted: Jan. 27 2004,12:37 pm QUOTE

None that I can think of, but my concern was due to the question being "How do I delist (archive) my caches?" as in plural/all.

While I understand caches get retired, the wording had me concerned and I want to make sure it is not due to a dissatisfactin with the site.


--------------
'PC Medic'
Back to top
Profile PM AOL YIM 
welch Offline
Caching Maniac




Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: April 2002
    Posted: Jan. 31 2004,7:59 am QUOTE

Ih, I see. I didn't read cacheS that literal.
Like how can I edit the location on my caches? when I really only need to know for one, but it works the same way everytime :;):


--------------
Back to top
Profile PM 
CoyoteRed Offline
Navicacher




Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: Dec. 2003
    Posted: Nov. 27 2004,7:17 am QUOTE

I've just retired my caches and I'm not shy about why.  Pretty much it's just because they were all cross listed with gc.com.  Really, there is little point in cross listing.  I have a local copy of the listings and most of the logs are on gc.com.  So, really, there is little reason.  I've got enough on my plate keeping up with gc.com and my letterbox listings to have to worry about redundancy.

A bit of advise if you're looking for more traffic.  Talk to ClydeE, the creator of GSAK, and try to get him to implement an open source GPX format to transfering cache data.  You've got to make it easy for folks to get the data.  The XML is a good start, but falls far short.  I would be interested in an open format as I'm sure other alternative site developers would be.  If we can show Clyde that there is a market--and I've already got Jeremy to commit to saying he doesn't care if GSAK imports an alternative--then that would be a major step.

Second, encourage unique listing.  Designate a field to show it is a unique listing so dual users can come here and find just the caches not listed at gc.com.  It's next to impossible as it is now.

Hope this helps.
Back to top
Profile PM 
Scout Offline
Cache Master




Group: Members
Posts: 721
Joined: June 2001
    Posted: Nov. 27 2004,7:24 am QUOTE

Quote (CoyoteRed @ Nov. 27 2004,8:17 am)
I've just retired my caches and I'm not shy about why.  Pretty much it's just because they were all cross listed with gc.com.

So, don't cross-list on gc.com ;-)


--------------
Scout  ( http://GPSgames.org )
Back to top
Profile PM 
PC Medic Offline
Cache Master




Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 1452
Joined: Dec. 2001
    Posted: Nov. 27 2004,1:56 pm QUOTE

Quote (CoyoteRed @ Nov. 27 2004,9:17 am)
I've just retired my caches and I'm not shy about why.  Pretty much it's just because they were all cross listed with gc.com.  Really, there is little point in cross listing.  I have a local copy of the listings and most of the logs are on gc.com.  So, really, there is little reason.  I've got enough on my plate keeping up with gc.com and my letterbox listings to have to worry about redundancy.


Sorry to hear this, but I would tend to agree with Scout on this one  :grinnin  and not just for the obvious reason.

I could give reasons for cross listing such as being able to have 2 legs of a multi (or even yours and anothers) cache within 528' of one another, open database for use by other sites like Buxley's Waypoints, No worry about getting that Virtual listed, No charge to access ANY part of our database... And the list goes on.

Quote

A bit of advise if you're looking for more traffic.  Talk to ClydeE, the creator of GSAK, and try to get him to implement an open source GPX format to transfering cache data.  You've got to make it easy for folks to get the data.  The XML is a good start, but falls far short.  I would be interested in an open format as I'm sure other alternative site developers would be.  If we can show Clyde that there is a market--and I've already got Jeremy to commit to saying he doesn't care if GSAK imports an alternative--then that would be a major step.


As for traffic, while we appreciate the advice I must say that in comparison you can not get much easier for acquiring our data. Also the the simple fact that one would feel they needed the Frogs approval for GSAK to import 'an alternative' would be cause for concern in my book and tells me it GSAK is not so 'Open Format' after all.


Quote

Second, encourage unique listing.  Designate a field to show it is a unique listing so dual users can come here and find just the caches not listed at gc.com.  It's next to impossible as it is now.


Perhaps Jeremy would like to implement this over on GC.com. I mean considering WE support the open-caching database  this would not be so hard for him to do. On the other-hand, with his very restrictive rules to cache data we can accomplish the same quite as easily.

Getting a little off topic for this 'How To' thread though, so further discussion on this would be best in a topic of its own.


Quote

Hope this helps.


Always welcome suggestions.


--------------
'PC Medic'
Back to top
Profile PM AOL YIM 
MOCKBA Offline
Navicacher




Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: Sep. 2004
    Posted: Nov. 27 2004,6:16 pm QUOTE

Quote (CoyoteRed @ Nov. 27 2004,9:17 am)
Designate a field to show it is a unique listing so dual users can come here and find just the caches not listed at gc.com.  

As your own example shows perfectly well, listings which are dual today may end up being unique tomorrow. Likewise some unique listings may end up crosslisted in the future.
And since gc.com wouldn't share its lists of archived or active caches, or allow 3rd parties to do it for them, I don't see how you are gonna find out about any changes in xlisted vs. unique status to keep the darn flag up-to-date.
But pardon me ... why would anyone really need this flag? How would it change anyone's take on any particular cache? Beats me.
Back to top
Profile PM 
8 replies since Jan. 26 2004,4:13 pm < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

 
reply to topic new topic new poll

Quick Reply: Delisting caches
iB Code Buttons
You are Posting as:
Guest
Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code