Joined: Jan. 2008
||Posted: Jan. 26 2009,5:20 pm
|Quote (PC Medic @ Jan. 26 2009,5:37 pm)|
|Quote (Amberel @ Jan. 25 2009,6:30 pm)|
|The second problem is that some caches have lat/long of 0.0/0.0. I reported this some time ago and gave an example. I was asked to try the download again. I found the example I had quoted was fixed, but all the other ones that showed 0.0/0.0 before continued to do so. No further fix was forthcoming, so I manually entered the locations for those caches and locked them so they didn't revert on subsequent imports. Far from ideal, I agree.|
Not sure when you last checked those caches, but it was corrected shortly after you notified me and they are working on my end.
I did another download immediately after your first reply to me, in which the one I gave as an example was OK but the rest weren't. Unfortunately I can't go back to that specific download to check it again.
My most recent download, on 15th Jan 2009, which is the only one I can check now, contained 7 caches. 2 of these had lat/long of 0 (one of them being a cache I placed myelf).
Flight Case by heffalump007
Sheep Walk by Amberel
Because the .txt files contain the co-ordinates I made the assumption it was a problem with the GPX export code rather than the database. But that doesn't explain why it is OK on some caches but not on others.
Is it the case that I should report such caches on a case by case basis?