Joined: Sep. 2003
||Posted: April 05 2004,9:34 pm
|Quote (welch @ April 05 2004,10:56 pm)|
|I would think it would go the other way first... a digital camera with gps, rather than a gps with camera. |
How many photographers might pay a little more if the location is on each image? VS. how many gps users want to be able to take pic a certain location?
You bought a camera to take pictures, and if stamps the coords on the pic, so much the better. If you bought a gps it was to make navigation easier, so if it takes pictures too, so what?
But it would be interesting to see what combo would win out, big camera with minimal gps functions, or big gps unit with probably crappy camera function.
I think either combination might work fine.. I'd certainly like to see either and already put the bug in Magellan's and Garmin's ear about it. If it were a GPS with photos, at least you could use the GPS to find your way back. A camera wouldn't help you there. Maybe I should approach a low end digital camera co as well.
Edited by MOCache on April 05 2004,9:39 pm